ONT Re: Architectronics Of Inquiry -- Discussion
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
AOI. Architectronics Of Inquiry -- Discussion 5
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
Jack,
Still just jumping around, as I am forced to do at the moment,
and I think that it's probably too early in the game to tackle
this issue yet, but I will record it here for a future referral.
In our off-sides scrimmaging we noticed an obstackle that rares
its ugly topic head almost immediately, and that is the problem
of the argots and the hermeneutics thereof that divers teams of
argonauts and hermeneuts use in their (dis-)respective huddles.
To wit, just by way of present examples:
Technical Foul 1
| Let !X! = {x_1} = {A} be an alphabet that represents
| one boolean variable or a single logical feature.
|
| DLOG D19. http://suo.ieee.org/ontology/msg04817.html
Technical Foul 2
| [parid3001] Topic maps are bodies of information that consist
| of "topics", each of which is a surrogate for a single subject.
| If every topic in a topic map is the only surrogate (or "proxy")
| for its subject, then users can find all information about that
| subject in a single (virtual) "location".
|
| http://www.isotopicmaps.org/tmrm/TMRM-3.10/TMRM-3.10.html
And the question, as you capitalized on my passing mention of it, is this:
JA: generally speaking, there are getting to be so many new languages
every week that i don't think there's much hope keeping up with
them UNLESS WE START FINDING BETTER WAYS OF TEACHING THEM to
each other, and i am not seeing that happen, even on the
far horizon.
Okay, let that serve to flag the play of words in question.
I'll take a time-out to contemplate what we can do about it.
Jon Awbrey
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
http://www.cs.bsu.edu/homepages/mighty/history.html
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o