Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

ONT Re: Hermeneutic Equivalence Classes




o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o

| Leibniz, "Elements of a Calculus" (cont.)
|
| 5.  We shall use letters (such as 'a', 'r', 'h', or 'm', 'p', 's' above) when
|     numbers are either not available, or they are at any rate being treated
|     generally and not considered specifically.  This we must do here, when
|     we are establishing the elements of the subject.  The same thing is
|     done in algebra, so that we are not compelled to show in individual
|     cases what we can show once and for all of an indefinite number of
|     instances.  The method of using letters here I shall explain below.
|
| 6.  The rule given in article 4 is sufficient for our calculus  to cover
|     all things in the whole world, as far as we have distinct concepts
|     of them, i.e. as far as we know some of their requisites by which,
|     after we have examined them bit by bit, we can distinguish them
|     from all others;  or, as far as we can assign their definition.
|     For these requisites are simply the terms whose concepts compose
|     the concept which we have of a thing.
|
|     We can distinguish many things from others by their requisites,
|     and if there are any whose requisites are difficult to assign,
|     we will assign to them in the mean time some prime number,
|     and use it to designate other things.  [?].
|
|     In this way we shall be able to discover and prove
|     by our calculus at any rate all the propositions
|     which can be proved without the analysis of what
|     has temporarily been assumed to be prime.  (In
|     the same way, Euclid never uses the definition
|     of a straight line in his proofs, but instead
|     used certain assumptions which he took to be
|     axiomatic.  But when Archimedes wanted to
|     go further, he was compelled to analyse
|     and define the straight line itself --
|     namely, as the least distance between
|     two points.)
|
|     In this way we shall discover, if not all, at any rate innumerable things;
|     both those which have already been proved by others, and those which can
|     ever be proved by others from the definitions, axioms, and experiments
|     which are already known.
|
|     This is our prerogative:  that by means of numbers we can judge immediately
|     whether propositions presented to us are proved, and that what others could
|     hardly do with the greatest mental labour and good fortune, we can provide
|     with the guidance of symbols alone, by a sure and truly analytical method.
|     As a result of this, we shall be able to show within a century what many
|     thousands of years would hardly have granted to mortals otherwise.
|
| Leibniz, 'Logical Papers', p. 18.
|
| Leibniz, G.W., "Elements of a Calculus" (April, 1679),
| G.H.R. Parkinson (ed.), 'Leibniz:  Logical Papers', pp. 17-24,
| Oxford University Press, London, UK, 1966.   (Couturat, 49-57).

o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o