ONT Re: New List & Classification of Signs
- To: Ontology <ontology@ieee.org>, Peirce List <peirce-l@lyris.acs.ttu.edu>
- Subject: ONT Re: New List & Classification of Signs
- From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@oakland.edu>
- Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 17:12:16 -0500
- References: <3DC8A8E9.3F3E915C@oakland.edu> <3DC96285.4FFFC89C@oakland.edu> <3DC96722.F335CDED@oakland.edu> <3DC96F2A.F4BDC57@oakland.edu> <3DCFD6C0.6FABABEE@oakland.edu> <3DCFFB6C.A2D3C49F@oakland.edu> <3DD06BE2.DAC1B987@oakland.edu> <3DD085C1.C830C2DE@oakland.edu> <3DD122B5.19BD9B0C@oakland.edu> <3DD12921.C4A54CC5@oakland.edu> <3DD14292.A3E1A154@oakland.edu> <3DD16CC1.591347C5@oakland.edu>
- Sender: owner-ontology@majordomo.ieee.org
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| 15. Revision of the Categories (cont.)
|
| In keeping with his architectonic hypothesis, Peirce attributed his revision
| of the categories to his logic. But I think there are other and more important
| reasons for this revision. As we have seen in some detail in Chapter 7, Peirce's
| theory of reality had run into serious difficulties in the late 1870's. This
| theory of reality is a direct result of the categorical theory of the "New List"
| and the cognitive theory of the 1868 papers. By denying the existence of first
| impressions of sense, Peirce had completely sundered the real from perception,
| so that direct acquaintance with reality cannot be gained by going to the source
| of our cognitions. The only alternative left therefore was to locate the real at
| the end of the series of cognitions by defining reality as that which is thought
| in the final opinion to which inquiry will lead. But Peirce then found himself
| unable to prove that in fact inquiry will ever lead to any final result and
| accordingly unable to prove that there is any reality. As a result, Peirce's
| position degenerates into an extreme form of subjectivism in which we are
| lost in a phantasmagoric maze of our own concepts. For one who called
| himself a realist, such a development was intolerable. (MGM, p. 301).
|
| Murray G. Murphey,
|'The Development of Peirce's Philosophy',
| first published, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1961.
| reprinted, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis, IN, 1993.
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o