ONT Re: Extension x Comprehension = Information
¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤
Let me correct one major slip and a few minor typos in the Figure
that I gave last time, and then proceed to explain what I can see
rightly in this picture of two distinct ways of factoring a fiber.
The more serious mislabeling is that the interpretant sign i that
was newly inserted in the interpretive framework should have been
set equal to the sign value 'Humanity' and not the property value
Humanity. The italics or quotes are needed in order to emphasize
that i is a sign or a concept, or being interpreted that way, and
not being regarded as an objective attribute, intension, property,
or quality, not as viewed via the interpretive frame of the scope.
o-----------------------------o-----------------------------o
| Objective Framework | Interpretive Framework |
o-----------------------------o-----------------------------o
| |
| q = Humanity |
| /|\ · |
| / | \ · |
| / | \ · |
| / | \ · |
| ooooooooooo }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}} s = Bartleby |
| · · · | |
| · · · | |
| · · · | |
| ··· | |
| · | |
| i = 'Humanity' |
| |
| |
| Factorization Of A Fiber Via Objects And Via Signs |
o-----------------------------------------------------------o
Okay, that should take care of the immediate potential for confusion.
I'll need a bit more coffee before I can proceed with the exposition.
Jon Awbrey
¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤