Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

ONT Re: Intension & Extension




¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤

RK = Robert Kent

RK: Compare Alonzo Church's discussion (below) of the intension and extension of
    a concept with the mathematical (Formal Concept Analysis) (Rudolf Wille and
    Garrett Birkhoff) definitions of the intent and extent of a formal concept
    on the middle of page 30 in the IFF Classification Ontology document:

RK: http://suo.ieee.org/IFF/versions/20020102/IFFClassificationOntology.pdf

RK: As an illustrious example, see the 19 formal concepts (with
    explicit intent and extent) in the concept lattice of the
    "Living Classification" on pages 74-76 of the same IFF
    Classification Ontology document.

¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤

Robert,

I have been looking at the Living Classification Lattice that
you mentioned, and I have a couple of questions just to start:

o-------o-------o-------o-------o--------o-----o------o--------o--------o---------o
|       | needs | lives | lives | needs  | di  | mono | motile | limbed | suckles |
|       | water | in    | on    | chloro | cot | cot  |        |        | young   |
|       |       | water | land  | phyll  |     |      |        |        |         |
o-------o-------o-------o-------o--------o-----o------o--------o--------o---------o
| leech | 1     | 1     |       |        |     |      | 1      |        |         |
| bream | 1     | 1     |       |        |     |      | 1      | 1      |         |
| frog  | 1     | 1     | 1     |        |     |      | 1      | 1      |         |
| dog   | 1     |       | 1     |        |     |      | 1      | 1      | 1       |
| hemiz | 1     | 1     |       | 1      |     | 1    |        |        |         |
| reed  | 1     | 1     | 1     | 1      |     | 1    |        |        |         |
| bean  | 1     |       | 1     | 1      | 1   |      |        |        |         |
| maize | 1     |       | 1     | 1      |     | 1    |        |        |         |
o-------o-------o-------o-------o--------o-----o------o--------o--------o---------o

FE = Formal Extent
FI = Formal Intent

1.  Are you using "object" and "instance" as synonyms?

2.  Can you explain to me in what sense it makes sense to you to say
    that {bream, frog} is the FE of the fo.co. "bream", or similarly,
    that {maize, reed} is the FE of the fo.co. "maize", as generators?
    I mean, you can say whatever you like, formally speaking, but I am
    asking this in the light of a supposed analogy to ordinary extension.

And now I can finally sleep ...

Jon Awbrey

¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤