ONT 3 laws of logic
"Mishtu Banerjee, SCIENTIFICALS" <mishtu_banerjee@telus.net> said in another
train:
"If you can not distinguish what is being said, you can
neither agree or disagree, or you can both agree and
disagree. The law of the excluded middle is violated."
... that is soooo true. It seems like classical logic puts the three laws
of logic out there as three independant axioms with no relation between them
expressed. Yet there is this relation between them of which you speak.
Why don't we complete our logical axioms by expressing this relationship
between the 3 laws? See diagram:
http://robustai.net/mentography/3laws.jpg
Seth Russell