Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: SUO: RE: Cyc Upper Ontology offer




> > The hubris of claiming ownership of all statements which
>are logically equivalent to a fair amount of human common sense is
>quite astonishing.
>---
>
>Pat, this is rather astonishing. I wonder how Doug woudl respond to
>the most absurd kind of example, such as that all primates are mammals.
>I wonder if he would seriously stick to the letter of the legal agreement.

No, I think I now understand his intention rather better, and it is 
quite reasonable and quite different from the interpretation I 
suggested. Doug is quite right to worry that a trivial mechanical 
rewrite or notation change (eg say transcribing the 'material' into 
KIF and changing all the name prefixes from %# to &&&) could enable 
someone to escape the letter of current copyright law.

There may be a form of words which would make the intent clearer.

Pat

---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
phayes@ai.uwf.edu 
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes