Re: SUO: Re: More KIF-ified Ontology Content
>Chris Partridge wrote:
> >
> > Chris [Menzel],
> >
> > I was not intending to suggest that there
> > should be an axiomatisation of immateriality
> > (or space) in the 'holes theory'. Merely that its
> > 'dependence' on immateriality should be noted somehow.
> > I think we both agree that the upper ontology should
> > contain the material/immaterial distinction
> > (if it is going to be anywhere).
>
>¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤
>
>Chrises,
>
>Is this im/material distinction the same
>as Aristotle's "form/matter" distinction?
>
Interjection by Pat:
Probably not. But why did you ask? What would depend on the answer?
Pat
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC (850)434 8903 home
40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office
Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax
phayes@ai.uwf.edu
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes