SUO: Re: More KIF-ified Ontology Content
Chris Partridge wrote:
>
> Chris [Menzel],
>
> I was not intending to suggest that there
> should be an axiomatisation of immateriality
> (or space) in the 'holes theory'. Merely that its
> 'dependence' on immateriality should be noted somehow.
> I think we both agree that the upper ontology should
> contain the material/immaterial distinction
> (if it is going to be anywhere).
¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤
Chrises,
Is this im/material distinction the same
as Aristotle's "form/matter" distinction?
Jon Awbrey
¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤