Re: SUO: Re: Lists & Archives Now Working
Jon,
I think it's only natural that for a little while, some discussion of an
administrative nature will continue on this list until we're sure that
folks have managed to subscribe to the new lists.
Adam
At 11:48 AM 12/1/2000 -0500, Jon Awbrey wrote:
>Adam Pease wrote:
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > I think Jim has already provided a quite clear reading of how to
> > segment discussion into the four different lists which now exist.
> > Ontology content discussion goes into this current
> > standard-upper-ontology@ieee.org list.
> >
> > The other lists are
> >
> > - SUO-KIF@ieee.org For KIF or related discussions
> > - SUO-CE@ieee.org Controlled English as a lanaguage for SUO
> > - Ontology@ieee.org Ontology discussions not directly related to SUO
> >
> > Adam
>
>¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤
>
>Adam,
>
>What can I say? If people continue to violate their
>own proscriptions, and to apply the rule of law in
>such an arbitrary and selective manner, then I can
>only respond to them in kind, which is easy enough
>to do, given that the <Reply> key attunes my response
>to the very score from whence a person's note arrives,
>however inconsistently collocated in the first place.
>
>And I notice that you have edited Jim's outline
>just a liitle bit from it's original statement:
>
> > SUO-KIF For KIF or related discussions
> > SUO-CE Controlled English as a lanaguage for SUO
> > Ontology Ontology discussions not directly related to SUO
> > (We'll need to figure out how to use this list.)
>
>As much as I, for one, can genuinely appreciate the admirable
>grasp of the situation that is "summed up ontogenetically" in
>the parenthetically tentative character of such a statement as:
>
>"(We'll need to figure out how to use this list.)"
>
>Well, I hardly think that such a pithy summary can be counted as:
>
> > a quite clear reading of how to segment discussion
> > into the four different lists which now exist
>
>That is, in anything other than your own elective interpretation
>of whatever portion of those words that you have a mind to count.
>
>Once again, I apulegize for posting this to the wrong list,
>that is to say, your list. I was almost going to say that
>maybe there needs to be a "New Agora" (NA) for legislating
>on a case by case basis what belongs where, but I fear that
>I would be at risk of being taken too seriously if I were to
>say that -- too late! too late! 'tis said and done already ...
>
>E-dios,
>
>Jon Awbrey
>
>¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤
-----------------
Adam Pease
Teknowledge
(650) 424-0500 x571