Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

RE: SUO: Lists and archives now working




Hi all, 
	.	Well it's starting to look like I'm outvoted. 

	.	I'll go along with what everyone decides. 



Cheers   				Graham Horn

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 
================================================
Phone:      	02.6244.1094  
Fax:          	02.6244.1199  
E­mail:    	Graham.Horn@aihw.gov.au <mailto:graham.horn@aihw.gov.au>


-----Original Message-----
From:	Adam Pease [mailto:apease@teknowledge.com]
Sent:	Saturday, December 02, 2000 3:08 AM
To:	Nicola Guarino; standard-upper-ontology@ieee.org
Subject:	Re: SUO: Lists and archives now working

Nicola,
I agree with you.  Your guidance sounds consistent with Jim's.
A discussion about how to define a concept, one name for which is
"Individual", fits in the current standard-upper-ontology@ieee.org
<mailto:standard-upper-ontology@ieee.org> .
Your bullets below do describe topics best covered on ontology@ieee.org
<mailto:ontology@ieee.org> .
Discussions about how to add the term ("Individual",noun) to a controlled
English lexicon belong on suo-ce@ieee.org <mailto:suo-ce@ieee.org> .
Discussions about (to give a somewhat fanciful example) whether referring to
Individuals requires KIF to quantify over expressions that dynamically
describe and Individual's parent classes and how the KIF language must be
altered to support that feature, belongs on the suo-kif@ieee.org
<mailto:suo-kif@ieee.org>  list.
Adam

At 10:45 AM 12/1/2000 +0100, Nicola Guarino wrote:
>I am confused. I believe that a technical discussion like that about 
>individuals should go to the SUO mailing list, while the "ontology" 
>mailing list should be reserved to things like
>
>- What is ontology
>- General discussions about ontology and logic
>- Ontology-driven applications
>- History of ontology
>- Poetry and ontology
>- Ontological aspects of US elections
>- and so on...
>
>Moreover, we should absolutely avoid to cross-post messages to multiple
lists!
>
>If we are not able to keep separate the main SUO list from the ontology 
>list, we should merge them (I hope not).
>
>Cheers,
>
>-- Nicola
>
>P.S.: I am planning to only subscribe to the main SUO list...
>
>
>  ---------------------------------
>
>Nicola Guarino
>National Research Council       phone: +39 O49 8295751
>LADSEB-CNR              fax:   +39 O49 8295763
>Corso Stati Uniti, 4            email: Nicola.Guarino@ladseb.pd.cnr.it
<mailto:Nicola.Guarino@ladseb.pd.cnr.it> 
>I-35127 Padova
>Italy
>
>http://www.ladseb.pd.cnr.it/infor/ontology/ontology.html
>(***updated 8/11/2000***)

-----------------
Adam Pease
Teknowledge
(650) 424-0500 x571