Thread Index (Page 75 of 274)
- SUO: OpenCyc as Starter Document,
jim . s3
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 22:56:59 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Re: Analogy,
John F. Sowa
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 21:05:17 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Re: SUMO is not a Starter Document,
John F. Sowa
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 20:55:39 -0400 (EDT)
- RE: ontology as science (was: Re: SUO: Re: (ELP's summary of MRW's standards experience)),
Burkett, Bill
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 18:47:51 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: RE: Re: The SUMO is a Starter Document,
West, Matthew R SITI-ITPSIE
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 18:37:29 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: SUO: Re: The SUMO is a Starter Document,
John F. Sowa
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 17:31:58 -0400 (EDT)
- ontology as science (was: Re: SUO: Re: (ELP's summary of MRW's standards experience)),
Mike Pool
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 17:17:21 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: Cyc review,
John F. Sowa
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 16:04:29 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: RE: Re: The SUMO is not a Starter Document,
richardm
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 15:55:43 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: RE: SUMO questions,
Ian Niles
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 15:25:03 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: CG: Re: SUO: CYC event vs. SUMO Process -- really different?,
John F. Sowa
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 15:15:43 -0400 (EDT)
- SUO: SUMO questions,
Erik Larson
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 14:42:31 -0400 (EDT)
SUO: Re: The SUMO is not a Starter Document,
John F. Sowa
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 14:16:41 -0400 (EDT)
SUO: request for clarification: did the SUMO motion pass or not?,
Fowler, Julian
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 13:52:04 -0400 (EDT)
Re: SUO: CYC event vs. SUMO Process -- really different?,
John F. Sowa
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 12:52:16 -0400 (EDT)
SUO: RE: (ELP's summary of MRW's standards experience) Was: A NEW FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT FORMAL MOTION...,
West, Matthew R SITI-ITPSIE
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 06:31:02 -0400 (EDT)
SUO: [Fwd: Voting Rules],
Robert Spillers
Tue, 17 Jun 2003 21:23:38 -0400 (EDT)
Re: SUO: RE: Evaluation Framework for Content Standards,
John F. Sowa
Tue, 17 Jun 2003 21:16:41 -0400 (EDT)
Return to top of Page
Return to IEEE P1600.1 Standard Upper Ontology (SUO) area
Mail converted by MHonArc