Re: Developing a standard for an ontology registry/repository
AA> The ontolog forum looks good for debates and discussions of
> ideas, but not for their organization, concording and realization.
The two lists can be used together. Ontolog has several different
email lists, which are devoted to specialized subtopics. The SUO
list can be devoted to the specialized topic of developing a
standard, which was its original purpose.
> Though, the calling roll shows a platoon, two many absentees,
> which need to be called to active duty.
The SUO list has voting procedures and membership rules. Those
procedures can be used to reorganize and revivify it.