Re: SUO WG rechartered for general activities,
Azamat,
I don't know what attitudes you are ascribing to John, but personally
I would feel no embarrassment if a Russian Federation Army man was to
coordinate such an extraordinary enterprise.
James
On Dec 4, 2007, at 8:52 AM, Azamat wrote:
> John,
> As i said, have nothing personal against James; again, only he has
> been trying to save the cause of SUO. But you'd feel embarrassed if
> a Russian Federation Army man to coordinate such an extraordinary
> enterprise.
>
> Re. what ideas to brainstorm in the first place, i suggest to start
> from what is most fundamental to the SUO:
> o What is its subject matter: the world of things; the universe
> of concepts; or the domain of master terms ? If it is the real
> world, then what is its basic features and contours or which ways
> are its things?
>
> o What are the key categories and meanings of reality, its
> standard ontology, and how should they be represented by semantic
> technology and knowledge systems?
>
> Azamat
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@BESTWEB.NET>
> To: "Schoening, James R Mr CIV USA AMC" <James.Schoening@us.Army.Mil>
> Cc: <standard-upper-ontology@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
> Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2007 4:55 AM
> Subject: Re: SUO WG rechartered for general activities,
>
>
>> Jim,
>>
>> The SUO has been an important forum, and I believe that it
>> is worthwhile to continue it in some capacity.
>>
>> I'd also like to respond to Azamat's comment:
>>
>> > i wonder why a US Army man coordinates such a peaceful activity.
>>
>> The short answer is that there is a lot of administrative work
>> required, and we are grateful that somebody is willing to do it.
>>
>> So we're all thankful for the work that Jim has put into the
>> effort over the years.
>>
>> John