Re: SUO Quo Vadis
Avril and Azmat,
That uses one of Aristotle's terms, but not
in the way that Aristotle used it:
> Substance: Everything that exists is a part of Substance.
> Everything except Substance itself is a proper part of Substance.
Aristotle's term for everything that exists was
_to on_ or Being.
> So, does anyone disagree with this? If many do, it is
> certainly a proof that maybe a consensus cannot be reached.
One question nobody has really answered is whether
we need an upper level. And if so, why?
John