Re: Directions for future research
On Monday 24 January 2005 07:50, M. Shamsfard wrote:
> A preprint version of the article can be found at:
> http://www.sepehrs.com/~shams/papers/hasti04.pdf
What I like most about your paper is the characterization of a "dynamic
ontology." (p.g. 2.) But I wonder if your ontology is "dynamic" enough. The
equivalent of what I suggest, were it possible, would be to maintain the
whole ontology in a constant state of pre-interpretation, so every ontology
which could be learned from the data is simultaneously present, and learning
only takes place when you have a problem, so only the perspective relevant to
that problem is "learned".
Do you mean dynamic in the sense of constant total re-interpretation, or only
in the sense that new meanings can be added incrementally?
-Rob Freeman