| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hello, I also believe that trying to make systems to learn and acquire the world knowledge like children is a basic and important attempt to build large knowledge bases, ontologies, lexicons and even inference engines. We have done a project which I think is toward a part of the challenge you mentioned. In this work (called Hasti) we assumed that the system is going to learn about concepts and their relations (ontological knowledge) and also words which refer to these concepts (lexical knowledge) through receiving simple texts. It starts from scratch, there is no ontology and no lexicon (except a very small kernel) at the beginnings. Just like a child, while Hasti learns more it can process more complex texts. The main idea is that babies are born with a kernel in their mind knowing how to learn (and not what to learn). The tests show good results in processing both general and specific texts for first grade of primary school children. Hasti processes Farsi (Persian) texts but its main learning algorithms is language independent. The main conceptual problem in Hasti is that although it can discover concepts and relations from simple texts but it has no visualization about them. It just learns like blind, deaf, unfeeling children who can read simple texts!! a paper on Hasti is published as; Shamsfard
" Learning Ontologies from
Natural Language Texts" , map the results to existing ontologies like SUMO. Your comments and critiques are welcome. Thanks Mehrnoush Shamsfard |