Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

good references re. ontologies for Smntic W*b

To: <standard-upper-ontology@ieee.org>
Subject: good references re. ontologies for S*m*ntic W*b
From: "L, Cathy" <cathy.legg@xmsg.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 05:37:55 +0000
Importance: Normal
Reply-To: <cathy.legg@xmsg.com>
Sender: owner-standard-upper-ontology@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG

Greetings all!

Not to reignite negative passions in this esteemed forum or anything, but I'm currently putting together a survey article examining the current state of research/development re. ontologies for the semantic web and was just wondering if anyone here would like to nominate what they see as the most insightful thing(s) they've seen written on the topic lately.

Thanks and best regards,
Cathy Legg.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: good references re. ontologies for S*m*ntic W*b
  - From: Tim Finin <finin@CS.UMBC.EDU>
- Re: good references re. ontologies for S*m*ntic W*b
  - From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@BESTWEB.NET>
- Re: good references re. ontologies for S*m*ntic W*b
  - From: John Bateman <bateman@uni-bremen.de>

Prev by Date: Re: good references re. ontologies for S*m*ntic W*b
Next by Date: [ RE:Re: Interoperability and Vagueness ]
Prev by thread: [ RE:Re: good references re. ontologies for S*m*ntic W*b ]
Next by thread: Re: good references re. ontologies for S*m*ntic W*b
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

good references re. ontologies for S*m*ntic W*b

good references re. ontologies for Smntic W*b