Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

RE: Ontologies for describing Enterprise Architectures



Title: Message
Zachary,
 
    Yes, this is something I'm trying to get our enterprise architects to consider, i.e., start with an upper ontology, build a good enterprise domain ontology, then specify an enterprise architecture.  They would use the ontologies for concepts and any other appropriate frameworks mentioned below.   Subordinate organizations could then build compatible enterprise architectures.
 
Jim Schoening
-----Original Message-----
From: Zachary Alexander [mailto:onto-z@ebtdesign.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 4:51 PM
To: 'Schoening, James R CECOM DCSC4I'; standard-upper-ontology@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Ontologies for describing Enterprise Architectures

Jim,

 

I would agree that IEEE 1471 is the standard for enterprise architecture descriptions.  However, I would question its relevance for describing Enterprise Architecture Ontologies. IMHO, IEE 1471, FEA, TOGAF and C4ISR are frameworks. The problem with a framework is that it does not provide explicit set of guidelines for creating definitions.  It has been my experience that EA projects rise and fall on the ability to reach consensus on definitions (e.g. objective, function, IS-A relationships, IS-Part-Of). Ontology Engineering principles and the underlying logic systems would provide a better tool for evaluating definitions than the current EA frameworks and give EA architects a more robust platform for performing trade-off analysis.

 

Zachary Alexander

The IT Investment Architect

ebTDesign LLC, (703) 283-4325

http://www.ebTDesign.com | http://www.semanticviewpoint.comhttp://www.p2peconomy.com 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-standard-upper-ontology@listserv.ieee.org [mailto:owner-standard-upper-ontology@listserv.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Zachary Alexander
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 12:29 PM
To: 'Schoening, James R CECOM DCSC4I'; standard-upper-ontology@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Ontologies for describing Enterprise Architectures

 

Jim,

 

I have not seen any announcements of Enterprise Architecture Ontology Work.

 

However, using ontology engineering practices should really help in standardizing Enterprise Architecture Descriptions. If you are thinking about developing an EA ontology, I would look at the presentation Leo Orbst gave to the Ontoforum. The presentation really outlines the differences in ontology representation.   The ontology representation will have a huge impact on the Enterprise Architecture description and the potential to do automated reasoning about the resources. I would also look at some of the old semantic modeling discussions, circa 1980, early 1990.

 

[1] http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/resource/tutorial/OntologiesForSemanticallyInteroperableSystems-ONTOLOG--LeoObrst_20040115b_files/frame.htm

 

Zachary Alexander

The IT Investment Architect

ebTDesign LLC, (703) 283-4325

http://www.ebTDesign.com | http://www.semanticviewpoint..comhttp://www.p2peconomy.com 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-standard-upper-ontology@listserv.ieee.org [mailto:owner-standard-upper-ontology@listserv.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Schoening, James R CECOM DCSC4I
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 10:57 AM
To: 'standard-upper-ontology@listserv.ieee.org'
Subject: Ontologies for describing Enterprise Architectures

 

Folks,

 

    'Enterprise Architectures' are in vogue, but when a large organization has multiple subordinant organizations independently developing their own enterprise architectures, there barely relate. 

 

    Is anyone aware of the use of an ontology for describing an Enterprise Architecture?  Or better yet, use of a common domain ontology for describing multiple architectures? 

 

    As an example, the U.S. Federal Enterprise Architecture is at http://www.feapmo.gov/fea.asp.

 

Jim Schoening