|
Dear
Colleagues,
I was just
wainting to be certain there were no other objections before posting the updated
document. I will do this in the next day or two.
If there are any
further issues, the process documented can of course be used to improve
itself.
Matthew West
Streamline Business Information Architect for
Supply Chain Management
Shell Information Technology International
Limited
Shell Centre, London SE1 7NA, United Kingdom
Tel: +44 20 7934
4490 Mobile: +44 7796 336538
Email: matthew.west@shell.com
Internet: http://www.shell.com
http://www.matthew-west.org.uk/
D6 (document 007, text version) is still
not in conformity with the IEEE voting rules which we have just followed in
the Martin matter. When an objection was raised on March 25, Matthew
West responded promptly that this error would be corrected.
But the document still reads that a "majority of those voting" is
sufficient to pass a motion. The correct phrasing is a "majority of
those qualified to vote". Lee
PS Will there be posted a rollcall of the recent vote, as in
previous votes?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 10:51
PM
Subject: Procedures Document
All,
As there are no objections
to adopting the below referenced procedures document, it is hereby approved
by unanimous consent.
Jim Schoening
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 20:45:55 -0500
Subject: SUO: Procedures Document
All,
This document was developed
and achieved consensus within the SUO Policies Subgroup, and has previously
been posted to this full list for comments.
Jim Schoening
|