RE: SUO: Procedures Document
Dear Jim,
I don't think there is a way to respond to this issue. In which
case there is no alternative but have a vote.
Matthew West
Business Information Architect - Supply Chain Management
Shell Information Technology International Limited
Shell Centre, London SE1 7NA, United Kingdom
Tel: +44 20 7934 4490 Mobile: +44 7796 336538
Email: matthew.west@shell.com
Internet: http://www.shell.com
http://www.matthew-west.org.uk
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Awbrey [mailto:jawbrey@att.net]
> Sent: 25 March 2004 09:39
> To: jim.s3@juno.com
> Cc: standard-upper-ontology@ieee.org
> Subject: Re: SUO: Procedures Document
>
>
>
> o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
>
> Jim, SUO Working Group,
>
> I object to adopting this document.
> In achieves none of the objectives
> that were discussed in open forum
> for such a document, adds a lot
> of procedural hocus-pocus to
> the punch-&-judy show that
> we already have, and the
> manner of its creation
> sets a bad precedent
> for all future work.
>
> Jon Awbrey
>
> o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
>
> > jim.s3@juno.com wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > Are there any objections to adopting Version 1.0 D6
> > of the procedures document at
> >
> > http://suo.ieee.org/SUO/SUO-Procedures/documents.html
> >
> > This document was developed and achieved consensus within
> > the SUO Policies Subgroup, and has previously been posted
> > to this full list for comments.
> >
> > Jim Schoening
>
> o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
> inquiry e-lab: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
> o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
>
>