Re: SUO: RE: RE: Program wants to work with SUO documents
> In my case the decision has always been because I considered
> the project technically flawed, and so a waste of time. But
> then Al Quaeda haven't asked me for help yet.
And when they do?
Guess it depends on how much money they can support the SUO effort
with, how much feedback they can give about robustness and maturity
of the ontology components, language flexibility (very important:
perhaps even right-to-left XML-readers?), and domain friendliness.
It is, after all, a pragmatic reality issue. And help and potential
applications are help and potential applications; can't argue
with that. Pretty convincing...
But to get back to the point: somewhere at the beginning of this
were some requests for information concerning
the nature of the proposed projects/consumers/givers of feedback
of some SUO efforts. These requests have been systematically
placed behind the smoke of the subsequent email-exchanges.
There are just not so deep ontological differences between providing
tools that, you are right, anyone can choose to use, and
putting effort into showing them how. I guess the SUO
position is more or less clear.
John B.