Re: SUO: Program wants to work with SUO documents
Philippe,
I try to decode the classification system of your MSO, its topmost classes
at the first place, in the clear language of the author, if possible.
Particularly, I wonder how it rearranges and reclassifies the WordNet top
level lexical concepts:
Entity and Group&Grouping;
State;
Event, Phenomenon, Act&Human Action&Human Activity;
Possession;
Psychological Feature
and Abstraction (Time, Space, Attribute, Relation, Quantity, and Set).
The enquiry has nothing to do with the valuation of your work.
Thanks.
Azamat Abdoullaev
http://www.eis.com.cy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Philippe Martin" <phmartin@meganesia.sci.griffith.edu.au>
To: <standard-upper-ontology@ieee.org>
Cc: <phmartin@meganesia.sci.griffith.edu.au>
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: SUO: Program wants to work with SUO documents
>
>
> The first version of my evaluation of the MSO according to the criterias
> listed in the BIKE questionnaire is at:
> http://www.webkb.org/doc/summaries/MSOevaluation.html
>
>
> > So I suggest we not just wait for the BIKE requirements, but decide
> > how we as individuals would want to evaluate these ontologies if we
> > wanted to start using one of them.
>
> I have also begun writing a document about possible recommendations (which
> may also be used as criterias) for ontology creation when the ontology is
> expected to be re-used in various languages or connected to other
ontologies.
> I hope I'll be able to finish it and publish its URL by Monday.
>
>
> Philippe
>
>
>