Re: SUO: RE: RE: Program wants to work with SUO documents
> I did not forget about the BIKE briefing, however, I was not
> able to get an approval to send out a briefing on BIKE at this time.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
There have been some serious issues raised concerning this involvement
of SUO on the SUO list; as far as I can tell (unless my email is
deluding me)
these remain unaddressed (in fact, completely ignored).
I take Stefano Borgo's proposal
> In my view, we should require that a proposed project satisfies at least the followings
> - the project must be totally open
> - the project must be of clear general interest
> - the project must have a clear relevance for the SUO initiative
to be an absolute sine qua non for involvements of
an international effort for a "standard" "upper" anything.
I take it that the non-reaction from the SUO list (apart
from running after the latest suggestion to again write
minipapers saying how excellent your individual ontologies
are) is a clear indication that this is *not* considered
an issue.
Is this a reasonable interpretation?
John Bateman.