Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

SUO: RE: SUO-STAT Program wants to work with SUO documents




Dear Jim,

See some comments on the questionnaire below.


Matthew West
Principal Consultant
Shell Information Technology International Limited
Shell Centre, London SE1 7NA, United Kingdom

Tel: +44 20 7934 4490 Mobile: +44 7796 336538
Email: matthew.west@shell.com
Internet: http://www.shell.com
http://www.matthew-west.org.uk


> -----Original Message-----
> From: jim.s3@juno.com [mailto:jim.s3@juno.com]
> Sent: 24 February 2004 22:04
> To: standard-upper-ontology@ieee.org; SUO-STATUS@ieee.org
> Subject: SUO-STAT Program wants to work with SUO documents
> 
> 
> 
> SUO WG,
> 
>         I have stated many times we need more real users to use our
> starter documents and provide  feedback and improvements.  We 
> need them
> to develop domain and system ontologies, to develop  actual 
> systems and
> tools.  We need them to propose new concepts and axioms, plus identify
> flaws  that really matter to their systems.  This will all provide
> valuable feedback to improve these documents.
> 
>         We now have at least one program to do this.  The Battle
> Information & Knowledge Exchange  (BIKE) Program is a 4-year 
> R&D program
> at my employer (US Army)  that needs a common upper  ontology 
> and wants
> to start working with one or more or our starter documents.  
> Mr. Kenneth
> Beam  is the manager of the program and Ms. Lisa Tran will be 
> working the
> ontology aspect of it. Ken  is out on paternity leave, but Lisa has
> joined the SUO list and will introduce herself shortly.
> 
>         BIKE now needs expert input on the attributes of each of our
> documents, from all  perspectives. Perhaps other potential users will
> also value this analysis.   
> 
> Suggested approach: 
> 
>         a. Develop an evaluation form with specific 
> questions, but also
> allow free-form input.   Below is a strawman list of questions. Please
> send any edits/additions/deletions, then let's use  our 
> consensus process
> to finalize the list.  
> 
>         b. Keep the questions generic to any user, since BIKE wants a
> potentially broadly  acceptable upper ontology anyway.
> 
>         c. Anyone may provide input, even if not a member of SUO or
> subscribed to this list.   Candidate ontologies should not be 
> limited to
> just SUO starter documents.
> 
>         d. To keep the inputs manageable and easy to review, 
> permit only
> one evaluation form per  person per ontology; however, allow 
> submission
> of updated forms. Allow rebuttals.   
> 
>         e. Post all evaluation forms and rebuttals to the SUO 
> web site in
> an orderly fashion.   Since this will require daily web work, 
> Oanh Trinh
> of the BIKE program is willing to help.    
> 
> To get started, please send edits to the below list of evaluation
> questions.
> 
> 
> Jim Schoening
> Chair, IEEE P1600.1 Standard Upper Ontology Working Group
> jim.s3@juno.com
> 
> ===============================
> Strawman Evaluation Questions for Common Upper Ontologies 
> 
> 1. Maturity: (How ready is it to use now? What capabilities 
> have already
> been demonstrated? Time  and resources needed to start using? 
> Potential
> for improvement.)
> 
> 2. Robustness: (Heavy weight vs. light weight ontology features?

MW: What does that mean?

> Potential for improving  robustness?  

MW: What would be an example of that?

> How well will it handle known
> requirements, such as those listed in SUO Scope and  Purpose.)
> 
> 3. Potential for broad acceptance: (How well will it support maximum
> number of domains?)
> 
> 4. Language Flexibility: (What ontology language is it in? 
> How stable is
> language?If desired,  could it be written in a different ontology
> language?)
> 
> 5. Ownership/Cost/Changes: (Who owns it? Any proprietary 
> restrictions on
> use? Any charges for  utilization? How will it get changed and who
> controls the changes? Is it being developed by a  Standards Developing
> Organization?
> 
> 6. Domain Friendly (How easy to develop domain ontologies 
> based on upper
> ontology?)

MW: I think you should ask a question about the principles and foundations
of the ontology, and perhaps just for "any additional information".
> 
> ________________________________________________________________
> The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
> Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
> Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
>