Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

SUO: RE: R: SUO-STAT Program wants to work with SUO documents




Jim,

A google search on "Battle Information and Knowledge" only
returned one powerpoint presentation, and that seems to be
behind a secure firewall where I can't read it.  

Do you have any publicly cleared information on the program?
It would be nice to understand the intended scope of work. 

Thanks,
Rich



Roberto Bordogna wrote:
> Jim, 
>               this is really a good news for the WG, in my opinion.  
> And I'll be glad to help for what I can.
>  
> Roberto Bordogna
>  
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <jim.s3@juno.com>
> To: <standard-upper-ontology@ieee.org>; <SUO-STATUS@ieee.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 11:03 PM
> Subject: SUO-STAT Program wants to work with SUO documents
> 
> 
> > 
> > SUO WG,
> > 
> >         I have stated many times we need more real users to use our
> > starter documents and provide  feedback and improvements.  
> We need them
> > to develop domain and system ontologies, to develop  actual 
> systems and
> > tools.  We need them to propose new concepts and axioms, 
> plus identify
> > flaws  that really matter to their systems.  This will all provide
> > valuable feedback to improve these documents.
> > 
> >         We now have at least one program to do this.  The Battle
> > Information & Knowledge Exchange  (BIKE) Program is a 
> 4-year R&D program
> > at my employer (US Army)  that needs a common upper  
> ontology and wants
> > to start working with one or more or our starter documents. 
>  Mr. Kenneth
> > Beam  is the manager of the program and Ms. Lisa Tran will 
> be working the
> > ontology aspect of it. Ken  is out on paternity leave, but Lisa has
> > joined the SUO list and will introduce herself shortly.
> > 
> >         BIKE now needs expert input on the attributes of each of our
> > documents, from all  perspectives. Perhaps other potential 
> users will
> > also value this analysis.   
> > 
> > Suggested approach: 
> > 
> >         a. Develop an evaluation form with specific 
> questions, but also
> > allow free-form input.   Below is a strawman list of 
> questions. Please
> > send any edits/additions/deletions, then let's use  our 
> consensus process
> > to finalize the list.  
> > 
> >         b. Keep the questions generic to any user, since 
> BIKE wants a
> > potentially broadly  acceptable upper ontology anyway.
> > 
> >         c. Anyone may provide input, even if not a member of SUO or
> > subscribed to this list.   Candidate ontologies should not 
> be limited to
> > just SUO starter documents.
> > 
> >         d. To keep the inputs manageable and easy to 
> review, permit only
> > one evaluation form per  person per ontology; however, 
> allow submission
> > of updated forms. Allow rebuttals.   
> > 
> >         e. Post all evaluation forms and rebuttals to the 
> SUO web site in
> > an orderly fashion.   Since this will require daily web 
> work, Oanh Trinh
> > of the BIKE program is willing to help.    
> > 
> > To get started, please send edits to the below list of evaluation
> > questions.
> > 
> > 
> > Jim Schoening
> > Chair, IEEE P1600.1 Standard Upper Ontology Working Group
> > jim.s3@juno.com
> > 
> > ===============================
> > Strawman Evaluation Questions for Common Upper Ontologies 
> > 
> > 1. Maturity: (How ready is it to use now? What capabilities 
> have already
> > been demonstrated? Time  and resources needed to start 
> using? Potential
> > for improvement.)
> > 
> > 2. Robustness: (Heavy weight vs. light weight ontology features?
> > Potential for improving  robustness?  How well will it handle known
> > requirements, such as those listed in SUO Scope and  Purpose.)
> > 
> > 3. Potential for broad acceptance: (How well will it support maximum
> > number of domains?)
> > 
> > 4. Language Flexibility: (What ontology language is it in? 
> How stable is
> > language?If desired,  could it be written in a different ontology
> > language?)
> > 
> > 5. Ownership/Cost/Changes: (Who owns it? Any proprietary 
> restrictions on
> > use? Any charges for  utilization? How will it get changed and who
> > controls the changes? Is it being developed by a  Standards 
> Developing
> > Organization?
> > 
> > 6. Domain Friendly (How easy to develop domain ontologies 
> based on upper
> > ontology?)
> > 
> > ________________________________________________________________
> > The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
> > Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
> > Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
> 
> &n
>