SUO: Re: Topic :> Definition Of System
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
Jim,
Here is a perfect example of what I was just talking about.
Someone who is not paying attention to an ongoing discussion
between several other members of the list, enough to know what
is even being talked about, and with no attempt to enter the
discussion in order to find out what is being talked about,
arrogates to himself the power and the privilege of trying
to break up the discussion and direct it to another location.
Scratch what I said about freedom of assembly til the end of year.
The questions are:
1. Why does he think he has the right to do that?
2. Why do we continue to tolerate him doing that?
These are not rhetorical questions.
A failure to address them is one
of the reasons that this Group
is going in circles.
Jon Awbrey
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
Jim Schoening wrote off-list (1) to Jon Awbrey:
>
> Jon,
>
> This topic has been moved to the SUO-Policies list.
> Could you post your contributions there. Thanks.
>
> Jim
>
> On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 10:44:19 -0500 Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@att.net> writes:
> >
> > o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
> >
> > Topic :> System 1. <JA, 09 Dec 2003, 08>
> >
> > o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
> >
> > 1. What is system?
> >
> > 2. What is a system?
> >
> > 3. What is systemic?
> >
> > 4. What is systematic?
> >
> > 5. What is systematization?
> >
> > 6. When is it systematic enough?
> >
> > 7. Do you think you can beat the system?
> >
> > 8. What are you doing the rest of your life?
> >
> > 9. Why do you have to be so obsessively systematic?
> >
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
http://www.cs.bsu.edu/homepages/mighty/history.html
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o