Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

SUO: Re: Topic :> Content :> Multi Source Ontology




o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o

Topic   :>
Content :> MSO 3              <JA, 05 Dec 2003, 02>

o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o

In: MSO.    http://suo.ieee.org/email/thrd1.html#11936
Hx: MSO 1.  http://suo.ieee.org/email/msg11940.html
Hx: MSO 2.  http://suo.ieee.org/email/msg11983.html
Cf: http://meganesia.int.gu.edu.au/~phmartin/WebKB/doc/onSUOlist/

Philippe,

As I read through your text and wander through your webpages
I find that I need to ask a couple of questions of you by
way of orientation to your work, and also with regard to
what you would like to accomplish here, and I also need
to ask a question of the Chair and any others who may
have expertise concerning intellectual property and
commercial proprietary protections and rights.

Questions for PM:

1.  What is the volume of work that is actually being submitted
    for review?  In other words, how much of the supplementary
    material that is linked to by extension withing the bounds
    of your webpages is meant to be purely informative and is
    not intended for evaluation here?

2.  In what variety of lights do you wish the submitted volume of work
    to be regarded here, over and above being a potential contribution
    to the prospective IEEE Standard Upper Ontology, or SUO for short?
    That is, do you see it yourself as a contribution more broadly to
    AI, computer science, engineering, logic, mathematics, philosophy,
    and so on, and feel that it is fair game to examine it from any
    of the perspectives that it may conceivably or eventually have
    bearing on, or do you prefer to have it regarded more narrowly?

Question for the Chair and for the Group at Large:

    I am not sufficiently familiar with the various issues of
    intellectual property and commercial proprietary rights
    to ask very informed questions here, but I sense that
    many issues of that sort must come up as we examine
    PM's work in a public setting.  In what ways does
    IEEE protect PM's work, and what is considered
    fair to ask about his work, and what not?

Jon Awbrey

o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
http://www.cs.bsu.edu/homepages/mighty/history.html
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o