SUO: Re: SUOP Topic :> Definition Of Issue
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
SUOPT :> ISS. Note 3
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
JA = Jon Awbrey
I am already fading long behind our caucus-race to get ahead of ourselves.
There's just time before my posting-already-long-postponed lunch -- soup?
no, corn pone! -- to rescue this old message from the new mess of news,
and to sort it to its new sorting tray, as I, it's exponent, think it
too important to get lost in the quagmire, but then an exponent would.
With reference to:
JA: SUOP Page 16. http://suo.ieee.org/email/msg11622.html
Copied in full here:
JA: I notice that a large number of issues, AKA questions,
are already being ignored by the procedure specifying
process already in process, if not yet to say progress.
I will begin a log of these. Here is one that is fresh
in my mind, at least, and so I will try to pluck it from
thin air, before it vanishes into same.
JA: OOI. Ontology Of Issues
JA: What is an issue, anyway?
JA: Does the being of an issue consist in it's possessing a special
set of properties, independent of it's being called by that name,
or does the being of an issue consist solely in it's being named
as such?
JA: I call it an issue.
Consider it logged.
If you can see it now,
then consider it sawn.
Jon Awbrey
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o