SUO: RE: Re: Standard Upper Ontology Procedures
Dear Jon,
I have no objection to your proposal (start at 1 not 0 if I understand
it correctly).
However, we are still getting ahead of ourselves. We are
discussing content before the purpose and Table of Contents is available,
and whilst the starter document I threw together is indicative of where
I want to go, I really consider the whole thing a throw away, and if no
content ends up being carried forward, I will not be unduly concerned
(provided we have something better of course).
So the next step is for me to propose a purpose, target audience and
Table of Contents for all to comment on. I'll try to do that by the
end of the weekend.
Matthew West
Principal Consultant
Shell Information Technology International Limited
Shell Centre, London SE1 7NA, United Kingdom
Tel: +44 20 7934 4490 Other Tel: +44 7796 336538
Email: matthew.west@shell.com
Internet: http://www.shell.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Awbrey [mailto:jawbrey@att.net]
> Sent: 13 November 2003 16:10
> To: SUO
> Subject: SUO: Re: Standard Upper Ontology Procedures
>
>
>
> o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
>
> SUOP. Note 6
>
> o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
>
> Matthew,
>
> Starting to read through this.
> My suggested cosmetic changes
> in square brackets, mostly to
> distinguish SUO from SUO WG.
>
> But could we change "Stage k" to "Stage k+1" for k = 0 to whatever?
> I realize some CS folks think this is cute, but it tends to confuse
> people at a later stage about how many stages they've actually done.
>
> More to come ...
>
> Jon Awbrey
>
> | Standard Upper Ontology Development Guidelines
> |
> | Version 1.0 D1
> |
> | Editor: Matthew West
> |
> | 1. Introduction
> |
> | The purpose of these guidelines is to set out the
> | process anddeliverables for Work Programme within
> | the Standard Upper Ontology [Working] Group.
> |
> | 2. Process
> |
> | 2.1. Stage [1]. Activity Approval
> |
> | A proposal shall be submitted as a motion to the
> | Standard Upper Ontology [Working Group (SUO WG)]
> | defining the objectives of a Work Programme and
> | include an outline of the deliverables of the
> | Work Programme. The motion shall also include
> | the nomination of a Project Manager for the
> | Work Programme.
> |
> | The motion may include reference to initial material,
> | or deliverable material for any later stages of the
> | process.
> |
> | The motion may include the nomination of additional roles
> | within the work programme, e.g., deliverable editor.
> |
> | If the motion is passed the Work Programme becomes
> | a recognised part of the Standard Upper Ontology
> | [Working Group] activity.
> |
> | ...
>
> o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
>
>