SUO: Re: Standard Upper Ontology Procedures
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
SUOP. Note 6
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
Matthew,
Starting to read through this.
My suggested cosmetic changes
in square brackets, mostly to
distinguish SUO from SUO WG.
But could we change "Stage k" to "Stage k+1" for k = 0 to whatever?
I realize some CS folks think this is cute, but it tends to confuse
people at a later stage about how many stages they've actually done.
More to come ...
Jon Awbrey
| Standard Upper Ontology Development Guidelines
|
| Version 1.0 D1
|
| Editor: Matthew West
|
| 1. Introduction
|
| The purpose of these guidelines is to set out the
| process anddeliverables for Work Programme within
| the Standard Upper Ontology [Working] Group.
|
| 2. Process
|
| 2.1. Stage [1]. Activity Approval
|
| A proposal shall be submitted as a motion to the
| Standard Upper Ontology [Working Group (SUO WG)]
| defining the objectives of a Work Programme and
| include an outline of the deliverables of the
| Work Programme. The motion shall also include
| the nomination of a Project Manager for the
| Work Programme.
|
| The motion may include reference to initial material,
| or deliverable material for any later stages of the
| process.
|
| The motion may include the nomination of additional roles
| within the work programme, e.g., deliverable editor.
|
| If the motion is passed the Work Programme becomes
| a recognised part of the Standard Upper Ontology
| [Working Group] activity.
|
| ...
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o