SUO: Re: Call for Volunteers for Methodology Project
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
Jim,
If no one else foresees a problem, and I don't foresee one
in Matthew's case, then I suppose that we can wait until a
problem arises -- I usually kick myself when that happens,
but I'll be sure to pass the boot around. I just thought
there should be 'some' discussion, and now we have duly
flagged a backtrack point when and if trouble develops.
Therefore I will withdraw my objection.
Thanks for your consideration,
Jon Awbrey
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
jim.s3@juno.com wrote:
>
> Jon,
>
> To a degree, you are correct. There is a mild conflict, but the
> significance doesn't come close to mattering enough to worry about.
> It's far better to have a passionate leader than an unbiased one for
> projects like this. Both groups must follow consensus and votes, so the
> leader has very little ultimate control. Unless there builds a consensus
> to appoint someone other than Matthew, would you reconsider your objection?
>
> Jim
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o