RE: SUO: RE: Motion to Develop a 4 Dimensional Ontology and include it as a Component within the Information Flow Framework.
> I am happy if we vote separately on point 1 and points 2 & 3 together.
>
> I suggest we keep this within one ballot, to keep the beaurocracy down.
>
> Would that be acceptable?
Sure, this seems wise to me.
Just to emphasize, the point is to formally separate the two putative groups
involved (even if they are co-extensional) on the basis of the scope of their
respective work programme. I take this is the effect of the solution you
propose.
> If so I will redraft the resolution to make
> this clear.
Since we're in the procedural nightmare, will the redrafted motion need a
second?
Best,
Pierre