SUO: Re: The SUMO is not a Starter Document
Adam,
I am sorry, but I misunderstood your intent. I was happy to
endorse SUMO as a candidate on the same footing as OpenCyc,
but not as something with higher status than OpenCyc.
> I'm disappointed in your note, and feel that you've reneged
> on our agreement to support each other's motions.
I am extremely disappointed that you have posted a statement
that implies SUMO has a more privileged status than OpenCyc.
If I had understood that to be your position, I would never
have voted for motion #1 and I would have insisted that we
have a vote to give OpenCyc the same status.
> Both votes passed, according to the rules clearly stated by
> the chair. We should be able to disagree about the technical
> merits of each other's proposals without engaging in this
> sort of maneuvering.
The last thing I want is more procedural maneuvering, and I
am very disappointed that you have posted a statement that
implies that SUMO has higher status than OpenCyc.
Please remove that statement from the web site ASAP.
Otherwise, I believe that there are two options:
1. Go through more wrangling with appeals.
2. Have another vote to clarify the point that
SUMO and OpenCyc have equal status.
John