Re: SUO: CG representations for WordNet
Richard,
Since KIF and CGs are equivalent, our Suggested Upper Merged Ontology
(SUMO) could be expressed in CG. We've mapped all 100,000 WordNet synsets
to SUMO. Both the ontology and the mappings are free. The mappings are
released under the GNU license. See our main page at
<http://ontology.teknowledge.com> or go directly to
<http://ontology.teknowledge.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/SUO/>. The SUMO is
listed as "Merge.txt" and the WordNet mappings are in WordNet file format
and labeled as WordNetMappings-Top.txt, WordNetMappings-adjectives.txt,
WordNetMappings-adverbs.txt and WordNetMappings-verbs.txt
Adam
At 10:29 AM 1/14/2003 -0800, Richard Cooper wrote:
> From reading "Task-Oriented Semantic Interpretation" at
><http://www.jfsowa.com/pubs/tosi.htm>http://www.jfsowa.com/pubs/tosi.htm
>I find that CG types are one-to-one with word senses, and
>each can have one or more canonical CGs. If word senses
>(types) are in a generalization lattice, does that mean that
>every node in the lattice has one or more CGs? How can I
>get hold of the actual CG structures?
>
>Using WordNet, I've been looking at the word senses and
>template phrases that are defined for each word. Is there
>a way to translate the WordNet entries into CGs? Or better
>yet, is there a database of CGs that corresponds to the
>WordNet entries?
>
>Having such a database resource should help NLP developers
>work with CGs and WordNet at the same time. Maybe this could
>even be related to the IFF concepts. Of course, the axioms
>from WordNet would be sparse, but that's another story for
>a future step.
>
>Comments appreciated,
>
>Rich