| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
From reading "Task-Oriented Semantic Interpretation" at
http://www.jfsowa.com/pubs/tosi.htm
I find that CG types are one-to-one with word senses, and
each can have one or more canonical CGs. If word senses
(types) are in a generalization lattice, does that mean that
every node in the lattice has one or more CGs? How can I
get hold of the actual CG structures?
Using WordNet, I've been looking at the word senses and
template phrases that are defined for each word. Is there
a way to translate the WordNet entries into CGs? Or better
yet, is there a database of CGs that corresponds to the
WordNet entries?
Having such a database resource should help NLP developers
work with CGs and WordNet at the same time. Maybe this could
even be related to the IFF concepts. Of course, the axioms
from WordNet would be sparse, but that's another story for
a future step.
Comments appreciated,
Rich