Re: SUO: SUO WG vs. SUO Project
Adam,
You wrote:
> Let me rephrase my statement then simply as a request that we split
off the language issue into a separate PAR.
This is an option that needs considerable discussion, so it is
best held until after the group decides if it wants to work on the Cyc
items.
Jim Schoening
>
> Adam
>
>
> >Jim
> >
> >On Sat, 25 May 2002 08:22:14 -0700 Adam Pease
> <apease@ks.teknowledge.com>
> >writes:
> > >
> > > Jim,
> > > In my view, the OpenCyc ontology certainly addresses the PAR,
> but
> > > CycL
> > > and CycML do not. They are simply related material that
> supports
> > > the
> > > ontology, much in the same way SUMO is stated in SUO-KIF and has
> a
> > > translation to DAML. Standardizing CycL or CycML would be
> separate
> > >
> > > projects under separate PARs.
> > >
> > > Adam
> > >
> >
> >________________________________________________________________
> >GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
> >Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
> >Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
> >http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
>
> Adam Pease
> Teknowledge
> (650) 424-0500 x571
>
>
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.