Re: SUO: 21 May 2002 -- Unanswered Questions About SUMO Set Theory
On 5/22/02 16:59, "Pierluigi Miraglia" <miraglia@cyc.com> wrote:
> It is to me. However, remember also to provide some elements of
> destructive criticism when you find the time: I, and probably others,
> wanted to know why the extant ontologies we discussed before (cyc, sumo,
> etc.) not only do actually but _will_ fail to fulfill these requirements.
Hi, Pierluigi..
If I said *will* then that more reflects the fact that I know it's hard from
an engineering standpoint to retrofit an existing complex artifact to do
some particular new thing. It wasn't any kind of statement of metaphysical
necessity or anything like that ;-D
More on the other stuff later.
Ciao.
.bill