SUO: Re: CG: Architectures for Intelligent Systems
> Then these "basic" concepts (and attributes/properties of the same simplicity)
> will have to be part of a common "core" ontology, possibly split between ...
> The speed come from the fact that there will be an immediate feedback from
> any remote ontology when queried about a new "proposed" concept.
Indeed, if you manage to have these last two points, I can now see where the
centralization lies and hence some similarity between our approaches. However,
this begs two questions (sorry if you have already answered them):
1) how is this common core ontology built? (by whom? with lexical items
interpretable differently by various persons?)
2) how is the "immediate feedback from any remote ontology" done? In my
approach, I suggested that competing KB servers are likely to
try to piggy-back (mirror) from each other, first manually, then automatically.
What's your idea?
> ... ultimate goal is about the same: having a large *consistent* knowledge base.
Ok.
Cheers,
Philippe