Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: SUO: OpenCyc Released




John,
Perhaps the first task is an evaluation of OpenCyc.  6,000 concepts with 
60,000 assertions about them is a large bite - it may take a while to 
digest. They also seem to have a large array of tools - a browser, 
inference engine, RKF tools, documentation and self paced learning 
tools, specification of CycL and translators to other languages, 
import/export facilities, an API and sample programs.  It appears to be 
a very comprehensive package.  It would be nice to get user feedback on 
this package before trying to smash it together with something else - 
particularly if the something else isn't widely admired.

Bob

Bob

John F. Sowa wrote:

>
> I'm very pleased that OpenCyc has finally been released.  Now we can
> discuss it seriously as an important resource for ontology instead
> of a hypothetical possibility for the future.
>
> That means we now have two large content resources, OpenCyc and
> SUMO, and the IFF project, which addresses the mappings and
> relationships among various resources.
>
> I suggest that the most important task before us is to address
> the following questions:
>
>  1. How are the OpenCyc and SUMO ontologies related or relatable?
>
>  2. Is it possible to merge, relate, or correlate them?  Should
>     they be merged into a single larger ontology, or should they
>     be organized in a library of modules that can be assembled
>     in different ways for different purposes?
>
>  3. How can they be used effectively together, by themselves, or
>     in communications between them and with other systems that may
>     use other ontologies (or no explicitly stated ontologies)?
>
>  4. Does the IFF have the mechanisms in place for relating them?
>     If so, what are they?  If not, how can they be added?
>
>  5. What tasks should be undertaken to assess the resources that
>     are now available, and how should we approach them?
>
> This is not intended to be an exhaustive list of questions, and
> I'm sure that other subscribers to this list can think of many
> more that should be considered.
>
> John Sowa
>
>