Re: SUO: Program Semantics
On 3/29/02 22:30, "Bill Andersen" <andersen@ontologyworks.com> wrote:
> Camp A: We'll call this Microsoft camp for convenience. Believes that
> having a standard stock of categories of sufficiently broad reach and
> functionality that users will be attracted to use it, thereby achieving
> interoperability more or less by fiat. This approach is completely
> pragmatic, laying no claim to, but willing to borrow from.
Have to fix my own message... The last sentence should read "This approach
is completely pragmatic, laying no claim to, but willing to borrow from
theory in whatever field may have something to offer"
.bill