Pierluigi Miraglia wrote :
(i) I suggest that, if anyone is interested, we continue ensuing discussion
as much as possible in a private manner off this list, as the connection to the
instutional goal of SUO is rather tenuous here.
RM : People will think that I am incorrigible but - forgive-me- I am not
able prevent myself to analyse your proposal like "politically
correct" because it is not a private question .
Indeed you connect
this question to the institutional aim of SUO: what could be more
public?...The acceptance of your proposan would be a delial of my
purpose...
Nevertheless I think that it would be counter-productive to
continue publicly and accordingly I am partisan of suspending the thread
until others start again it.
Indeed one be able consider that the question of
the neutrality of ontologies is stated and that brief replies are
given.
It therefore rests on everybody to wonder in conscience the deontology
of the practice of the ontologists.If is true that the construction of
ontologies occurs on an ideological base concealed in the eyes of the actors
then sufficiently strong contradictions will emerge so that they appear in the
future discussions.
Now I make my profit of your critical remarks which
supply my own reflection very usefully and thank you.
I finish in
French with a well-known quotation of Rabelais: "Science sans conscience
n'est que ruine de l'âme".
Robert Marty
**************
"If you want truly to understand something,
try to change it" (Kurt Lewin)
***************