SUO: Re: Re: Sign Relations & Communication
From: "Jon Awbrey" <jawbrey@oakland.edu>
> o-----------------------------o
> | Sign Relation L(2) |
> o---------o---------o---------o
> | Object | Sign | Interp |
> o---------o---------o---------o
> | Rover | "Dog" | [Dog] |
> | Specs | "Dog" | [Dog] |
> | Trixy | "Dog" | [Dog] |
> o---------o---------o---------o
Ok. I would like to follow along with my notation ... hence:
http://robustai.net/mentography/awbreySignRelation.gif
However I note that I end up seeing a catagory error in the diagram. The
arrows that I must draw in the graph based solely from you table, above,
seem wrong. The arrows labeled object from the sign relationship instances
should all be drawn with their sarp end on the box labeled "Objects that are
dogs" rather than to the individual dogs as objects. Otherwise it seems to
me that you are mixing signs for plurals with signs for individuals.
Seth Russell