Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

SUO: Critique Of Non-Functional Reason

To: Stand Up Ontology <standard-upper-ontology@ieee.org>
Subject: SUO: Critique Of Non-Functional Reason
From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@oakland.edu>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 09:00:09 -0500
CC: Arisbe <arisbe@stderr.org>, Gdsemiocom <gdsemiocom@univ-perp.fr>
Reply-To: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@oakland.edu>
Sender: owner-standard-upper-ontology@majordomo.ieee.org


¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤

Critique Of Non-Functional Reason

¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤

Thesis.  Mathematics and its applications in physics
and the other special sciences are serving moderately
successfully to describe the world as we know it today,
while logic lags behind in a largely ineffectual state.

Inquiry.  Why is this?

I have a few ideas that I intend to share with you anon.

Jon Awbrey

¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤

Follow-Ups:
- SUO: Re: Critique Of Non-Functional Reason
  - From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@oakland.edu>
- SUO: Re: Critique Of Non-Functional Reason
  - From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@oakland.edu>
- SUO: Re: Critique Of Non-Functional Reason
  - From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@oakland.edu>
- SUO: Re: Critique Of Non-Functional Reason
  - From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@oakland.edu>
- SUO: Re: Critique Of Non-Functional Reason
  - From: Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@oakland.edu>
- Re: SUO: Critique Of Non-Functional Reason
  - From: Mike Pool <mpool@iet.com>

Prev by Date: Re: SUO: Modular SUMO
Next by Date: SUO: Re: Focus & Horizon
Prev by thread: SUO: Re: modules: syntactic annotation
Next by thread: Re: SUO: Critique Of Non-Functional Reason
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread