SUO: RE: Re: Conformance (actually, "standards profiles")
Dear Seth,
See below.
Matthew West
Principal Consultant
Shell Information Technology International Limited
Shell Centre, London SE1 7NA, United Kingdom
Tel: +44 20 7934 4490 Other Tel: +44 7796 336538
Email: matthew.r.west@is.shell.com
Internet: http://www.shell.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Seth Russell [mailto:seth@robustai.net]
> Sent: 22 October 2001 23:24
> To: Frank Farance; standard-upper-ontology@ieee.org
> Cc: SWAG
> Subject: SUO: Re: Conformance (actually, "standards profiles")
>
>
>
> From: "Frank Farance" <frank@farance.com>
>
> > Standards profiles are used pretty often when referring to a bundle,
> collection, subset, superset, etc. of standards.
> > Does this approach address your concern? Is this "posh"
> enough for you?
> :-)
>
> Yes I think think standards profiles would work and might be
> quite eligant.
> Are these profiles chosen by the user, or prescribed by the
> standards body?
> I prefer the former. But I really should recuse myself from further
> discussion of standards as I don't even believe in creating a standard
> ontology. I just want a dictionary in which to look up terms
> such that
> others will understand what I am trying to say.
MW: But that is what a standard is ... something that is used by a lot
of people.
>
> Seth Russell
>
>