SUO: Re: Conformance
Jon,
Please see my reponse below.
Jon Awbrey <jawbrey@oakland.edu> on 10/16/2001 04:38:27 PM
To: John.Velman@HSC.com
cc: standard-upper-ontology@IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: Conformance
¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤
JV = John Velman
[snip]...
JV: On the other hand, it would be useful to have a clause -- possibly an
informative annex, rather than a normative clause -- describing how the
Upper Ontology can be used in support of a domain specific ontology.
This would require the group to become familiar
with some of the domains of practice to which
they seek to dictionate.
Jon Awbrey
-------
JV Response: Yep. Thats a good point, and a good reason to
stick to creating a "posh dictionary" as Matthew called it in
another message. Of course creating a "will be used" dictionary
depends on factors you've mentioned in another message.
John V
¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤