Re: SUO: single vs. multiple ontology standard
John,
I agree.
John.Velman@HSC.com wrote:
> As I understand the rules of the game, those of us who believe in
> modularization could work on this plan without overturning anything. SUMO
> as of the ballot edition is already a resource for SUO, as is IFF, as of
> it's ballot edition.
>
> This sounds like a good approach. What it needs is a leader and a little
> (understatement!) planning. I think it could garner a group of workers.
Yes, planning is essential, a sound theoretical foundation is
essential, and, by the way, some funding would certainly help.
John Sowa