Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

SUO: IFF vote

To: "'Standard-Upper-Ontology '" <standard-upper-ontology@ieee.org>
Subject: SUO: IFF vote
From: Robert Grayson Spillers <skydog@postoffice.pacbell.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 12:37:03 -0700
Reply-To: Robert Grayson Spillers <skydog@postoffice.pacbell.net>
Sender: owner-standard-upper-ontology@majordomo.ieee.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726Netscape6/6.1


Regarding the IFF motion - I vote NO.

I do not think any proposal should enjoy a privilege over any other at 
this stage.  I believe the SUMO vote will ultimately fail and would not 
like to see any other proposal gain such an advantage.

This is not intended to be negative about the IFF.  I do think there are 
issues that others have pointed out that possibly could be worked 
through.  My vote is not a technical judgment on the IFF.  

Bob

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SUO: IFF vote
  - From: jjc <josef@ix.netcom.com>

Prev by Date: SUO: SUMO / IFF
Next by Date: Re: SUO: a silly question about the new modular architecture
Prev by thread: RE: SUO: SUMO / IFF
Next by thread: Re: SUO: IFF vote
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread