| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Dear Adam,
In principle, I would be delighted to help. However, I can identify two major issues:
- I do not have a great deal of spare (unfunded) time;
- I am acutely aware of awning gaps in my ability to understand much of what is going on here. I do and believe I understand information modelling. I am not sure in a concrete sense of how this relates to the SUO.
If you want a summary of the content then you need to look at the EXPRESS schema:
http://www.nist.gov/sc4/step/parts/part519/is/wg12n380.exp
which references the following schemata:
http://www.nist.gov/sc4/step/parts/part041e2/fdis/WG12N525.exp
http://www.nist.gov/sc4/step/parts/part047/is/part47.exp
However, this is only one approach to the modelling of tolerances. I believe that Matthew West would point you at what I suppose is in the EPISTLE Core Model.
Cheers,
Tim.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Pease [mailto:apease@ks.teknowledge.com]
> Sent: 23 August 2001 07:07
> To: Tim King; 'standard-upper-ontology@ieee.org'
> Subject: RE: SUO: Representation for Precision
>
>
>
> Tim,
> Many thanks for the reference. If you'd be willing to extract or
> summarize key parts of the standard that would be relevant to
> SUO we'd be
> glad to formalize it. Because there are so many areas of
> knowledge that
> need treatment in the SUO, it would be great if we could
> continue to sign
> up people to be what might be called "technical area editors"
> who could
> either propose small theories that would be combined into
> future proposals,
> or even people who could collect and digest material into semi-formal
> English statements that could then be expressed in logic.
> What do you think?
>
> Adam
>
> At 05:42 PM 8/22/2001 +0100, Tim King wrote:
>
> >My own background would lead me to start with the following
> ISO-10303 part:
> >
> >Application Interpreted Construct 519 (Geometric tolerances)
> >
> ><http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail
?CSNUMBER=29958&ICS1=25&ICS2=40&ICS3=40>http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?CSNUMBER=29958&ICS1=25&ICS2=40&ICS3=40
>
>
>Other work is on-going to create an ISO-10303 Application Protocol (219)
>that is to be harmonised with the DMIS standard (DMIS standard (American
>National Standards Institute (ANSI)/CAMI-I 101-1995).
>
>... however, this strikes me as getting into the non-Upper domain.
>
>Cheers,
>Tim.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Randall R Schulz
> [<mailto:rrschulz@cris.com>mailto:rrschulz@cris.com]
> > Sent: 22 August 2001 16:49
> > To: standard-upper-ontology@ieee.org
> > Subject: RE: SUO: Representation for Precision
> >
> >
> >
> > Tim,
> >
> > That's good to know and comforting. Please supply references...
> >
> > Anybody?
> >
> > Randall Schulz
> > Mountain View, CA USA
> >
> >
> > At 07:06 2001-08-22, you wrote:
> >
> > >Again, before we embark on large quantities of less than
> > well-informed
> > >debate in this area, there are large bodies of knowledge and
> > information
> > >modelling in respect of engineering tolerances.
> > >
> > >Cheers,
> > >Tim.
> >
Adam Pease
Teknowledge
(650) 424-0500 x571