Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: Re: SUO: Vote 2001-02: IFF Foundation Ontology




Hi,
         Thanks for your comments.

At 05:23 18/08/01 -0400, vous avez écrit:
>Hi,
>
>There's no need to use the foundational IFF system only, just as
>this message doesn't appear to you as IP packets or 1's and 0's.

I do not think I have to use IFF system only.


>The linguistic mainstream Categorial Grammar and Lambek grammar
>are based on the same intuition as category theory, ie looking for
>compositions such as the way linguistic categories compose in a
>sentence.

I don't know it. Perhaps I have to try.

>Your work sounds interesting, in looking at the cognitive force
>of the verbal traces of problem-solving.
>
>Have you seen this ? it seems to keep track of multi-dimensions:
>http://home.student.uva.nl/balder.tencate/dip/dip150601.html
>
>
>yy

I went to see on the site, I found the interesting outline of Reinhard 
Muskens but unfortunately I did not find anymore information in english.

Josiane